Male and Female Genital Mutilation

Don't stay trapped in a propaganda trap - Dare to read the evidence.

Did you know that American male soldiers have had their foreskins forcefully amputated under threat of Court Marshal? And that social-engineering doctors in America first began circumcising without consent by parents?

While both practices of male and female genital mutilation are a blatant violation of horrendous nature, we are going to concentrate here mainly on that which receives far less attention in our modern society: male genital mutilation or circumcision.  Every thirty seconds in this country a baby boy is circumcised – 100 cause deaths, 12,000 are botched, the rest are left sexually maimed for life (find out why).

Worldwide there are 5 male victims to every 1 female victim of sexual mutilation.

Would there be an instant outcry in America if every thirty seconds a woman clitoris was cut off without any anesthesia? And that is what is happening to a little boy in this nation - every 26 seconds. How are we any better than Africa with the female and male mutilation done there? At least in Africa, many of the cultures circumcise the boys when they are old enough to run away when someone comes at them with a knife. Can you see the absurdity?

Female circumcision is declared "genital mutilation" by "civilized" Americans. Yet...
The foreskin has more than 20,000 nerve endings! The clitoris has around 8,000!
So were is the public outcry for the debauchery of male circumcision?

You’ll soon find out why this isn’t talked about much (videos and links).  As in any case where freedoms of trampled upon, there is an underlying reason why the TRUTH hasn’t come out. You owe it to your family (and the next boy infant about to loose the most significant part of his sexual organ) to become informed. You are also about to find out why women married to circumcised men suffer too. This practice has to be STOPPED or our society will continue to bear out its consequences due to the resulting sexual frustration and deviancy this causes. When your subconscious knows that one can never truly find the level of satisfaction it is craving, that person may seek out all manner of activities to get the thrill the body simply can't generate in a normal fashion.

Men circumcised in adulthood say the loss of feeling is as much as 90%!!!

"Circumcision removes a piece of skin almost equivalent to a 3 x 5 index card."
Say No to Circumcision! 40 Compelling Reasons
Thomas J. Ritter, MD, and George C. Denniston, MD , Hourglass Book Publishing, 1996

"A piece of skin the size of a quarter contains more than three million cells,
12 feet of nerves, 100 sweat glands, 50 nerve endings, and almost three feet of blood vessels."
The Human Connection Ashley Montagu and Floyd Matson McGraw-Hill, 1979

It’s not that circumcised men have less of a sex drive – they are just more frustrated because it is harder to be satisfied (as is the case with their women – we’ll explain anatomically why). The University of Chicago “National Health and Social Life” survey revealed the circumcised males masturbate more. [B]y the end of the second week [after circumcision] about 75% of my sensitivity was gone ... my glans ... [now] requires greater pressure to achieve orgasm ... Concerning anal sex, I was never big on it ... now I seek it constantly; it is, in a way, a longing for the protective sheath I have lost--along with its moisture and warmth." ("Circumcision: Prime Cut," by George Desantis, QQ Magazine, March/April 1976).

Circumcision first began in Egypt over 5000 years ago
as part of a ritual of worship to the "Snake God."

The barbaric practice of circumcision has been carried out in our hospitals on non consenting, screaming baby boys at the behest of parents who have never bothered to do enough research to trace its roots back to ancient Egypt where in a pre-Moses era, circumcision was practiced as a means of satisfying the voracious appetite of the snake god in the hopes of becoming immortal. And why did they choose the penis as the ultimate “sacrifice”? Well, the priests in all their glorious powers of God-like deduction, decided that the one part of the male anatomy that most looked like a snake must be partially walloped off. Yes, this was sure to appease the snake-god, and like many other parents throughout history who lose their wits when someone in authority beckons for compliance (be it a priest , rabbi or doctor), the Egyptians were willing to hand over their hapless sons for butchery – and they are still doing it today – even though no circumcised male has become immortal.  When they blightlhy tout the line - "It represents a covenant with God," one has to ask: "What covenant?" Do they mean - one with a “Snake God?"

Mothers do you really want to trust your doctor on advice for Circumcision? Did you know that female circumcision was espoused in the United States by doctors until the late 1950’s? And yet some people still treat these physicians as gods. This is the same medial profession that deemed tonsils and appendixes to be throw-away parts. Now we find they have a function to preserved if at all possible.

"By means of shrewd and unremitting propaganda, it is possible
to make people think that heaven is hell and the hell is heaven." Adolph Hitler

Could there possibly more than just a social/religious reason to this propaganda? Absolutely. Just follow the money trail. Today, the medical industry makes a big business out of foreskins. While the "official line" is to deny this, hospitals make a high sideline profit. Circumcision is a $400,000,000 a year industry in the US alone.  Oh yes, part of your darling son’s DNA is likely to wind up in some high-priced skin cream bottle at the ready to be smeared on an aging woman’s face. Is that what you had in mind when you asked the all-too willing doctor to do the surgery? Are you surprised the “ethical” hospital administration didn’t try to persuade you?

Before you believe the lie that circumcision is “for the good of their health” read recent studies: "Several new studies have shown that circumcised males are at higher risk
for developing genital warts, gonorrhea, syphilis,
non-gonococcal urethritis, and HIV infection."
(Robert S. Van Howe, MD, Letter to the American Academy of Pediatrics, Nov. 17, 1995)

The lie that female partners of circumcised males have a higher rate of cervical cancer has also been debunked. Widespread ignorance prevails in our community about circumcision. In the words of one doctor, "I was taught zero about the foreskin." In the words of a medical student: "In my anatomy textbook, there are two lines about the foreskin." Other medical personnel admitted they were paid to lie about "clinical studies" in favor of circumcision.

NEWSPAPERS THAT FAIL TO REPORT THE "FULL STORY"
The New York Times - The Washington Post - The Wall Street Journal
(John/Joan -- withheld the fact that the baby's penis was burned off while he was being circumcised)
 

There are numerous accounts in medical journals of babies who have had part or all of their glans cut off while they were being circumcised.^{1, 2, 3} Other fully conscious, unanesthetized babies have had their entire penis burned off with an electrocautery gun.^{4, 5, 6} The Journal of Urology in their September 1989 published an account of four such cases. Following the mishaps a sex-change operation of "feminizing genitoplasty," was performed on these babies in an attempt to change them into girls. Imagine the horror of one youth to learn that a circumciser had burned his penis off when he was a baby and as described in the March 1997 Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, this individual now living as a "she" had had been born a normal male, but that.⁷ Many other similar cases have been documented.^{8, 9.}

Yet mainstream media in the case of John/Joan kept the botching of circumcision out of the news. God-forbid the public would discover that circumcision is anything but a "risk-free" procedure. Watch the 6-part video set below to learn how men are now suing hospitals and winning because they did not consent to the mutilation. Yes, follow the money trail. Hospitals would rather the public never knew they were duped.

In "Feelings Too Violent to Describe"
John Erickson distilled some statements by circumcised men:

Studies performed at the University of Colorado School of Medicine showed that circumcision is followed by prolonged, unrestful non-REM (rapid-eye-movement) sleep. In response to the lengthy bombardment of their neural pathways with unbearable pain, the circumcised babies withdrew into a kind of semicoma that lasted days or even weeks.¹⁰ Dr. James Prescott, a developmental neuropsychologist suggests that circumcision can cause deep, disturbing levels of neurological damage, as well.¹¹

Erectile dysfunction is much more common amongst circumcised men.

When an infant or child is circumcised, they did NOT make the decision.
Clearly, this makes it a VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS.
SHOULD A PARENT HAVE THE RIGHT TO MAKE THIS DECISION?

Here's what the parents are robbing: the foreskin comprises up to 50% (sometimes more) of the mobile skin system of the penis. If unfolded and spread out flat, the average adult foreskin would measure about 12-15 square inches. Also lost in circumcision are branches of the dorsal nerve and between 10,000 and 20,000 specialized erotogenic nerve endings. Having a foreskin does not make infection of ANY kind more common. In fact, the folds of the foreskin act as a lid to protect, much like the eyelid protects the eye from infection. This highly specialized tissue normally covers the glans and protects it from abrasion, drying, callusing (keratinization), and contaminants of all kinds.

Over a man's lifetime, the foreskin (which accounts for as much as 1/3 of the penal skin because it is a double layer of skin), the weight of this extra skin helps to elongate and lengthen the penis. Would so many men want an extension in adulthood, if their parents had not removed so much of their penises at birth?

Furthermore, would women's failure to achieve sexual happiness be so prevalent in society, were it not for her partner’s anatomy amputation? Is she yet another casualty of this religious/medical genital mutation fixation?

It seems so. And for the following reasons: the Coronal Ridge Hook of the uncircumcised penis scrapes the vaginal walls, causing soreness. On every outward stroke, research has revealed that the circumcised penis draws lubricating fluids out of the vagina, making sex uncomfortable for the woman. Also, because the process of circumcision removes nerve endings at the tip of the penis, the circumcised male must thrust harder from the base of the penis to make contact with where these other nerves congregate. These "other nerves" are located on the lower part of the penis and are pressure sensitive, requiring much harder force to give the male pleasure. This makes for harsher bang-away thrusting and comes in contact with the upper clitoris area less often. The uncircumcised male has more problems with premature ejaculation and less control.

In the book, "Sex as Nature Intended it" the author Kristin O'Hare tells of a survey of women. They preferred sex with a natural penis by a margin of  9 to 1  — not 2 to 1, or 3 to 1, but  9 to 1. A quote in the book reads: "I've been going my whole life thinking there is something wrong with me for not wanting to have sex as long as the man does and for not liking the pounding thrusts needed by him to orgasm. I thought soreness was normal, that if I was only turned on more, I'd be wetter.  What a relief it is now to know that it's not my fault, but rather it's the circumcised penis."

Moses Maimonides - Jewish Rabbi (1135-1204 A.D.)
“As regards to circumcision, I think that one of its objects is to limit sexual intercourse,
and to weaken the organ of generation as far as possible...
The bodily injury caused to that organ is exactly that which is desired;
...for there is no doubt that circumcision weakens the power of sexual excitement,
...Our Sages say distinctly: It is hard for a woman,
with whom an uncircumcised had sexual intercourse, to separate from him."
 

When a woman finds intercourse discomforting and fails to achieve orgasm, it's understandable that she could lose interest in sexual relations. By contrast, when men get their pleasure in the proper area of their bodies, so do women. When he naturally wants to tilt his thrust forward, this placement of the body can be more intimate and personal, thus increasing the emotional connection of the love union.

Whose Body, Whose Rights? The Truth About Circumcision

One could argue that the young man could run away - but doing so would mean facing
excommunication from his tribe. This same type of communal pressure causes people
across this planet to conform to control in various ways.

This planet will never be free until we start teaching the CORE tenets of freedom.
Only then will people such as this young man understand that nothing is worth
destroying his body - not for religion - not for family - not for a cultural practice.

Let us begin to live by this creed of sovereign freedom - ourselves.
Let us begin to speak out against mutilation in our nation - in our families - in our churches.

"But I don't have any children that I will be circumcising. This information doesn't apply to me."

That next baby in your extended family to be circumcised has no voice but yours.

SPEAK OUT TODAY

Send people to this site.

KEEP BABIES INTACT - DIDN'T THEIR CREATOR KNOW BEST?
HELP MEN LEARN ABOUT RESTORATION (see link below)

Myths about Male Genital Mutilation

Myth – A boy should look like his father. My husband is circumcised, so my son should also be circumcised.
Fact – In reality, this argument is disgusting. How many times are you planning on exposing the child to his naked father's genitals? Besides, children differ from their parents in all kinds of ways, including hair color, eyes, build etc. Are you going to persecute your child just because you or your husband was mutilated? The same applies if you have already had an older male child who is circumcised. Does two mutilations make the first right?

Myth – Circumcision is just a little snip - no real pain.
Fact – A baby feels more pain than an adult; and boys have a lower threshold to girls. The operation is far more than a "snip" - the operation takes up to fifteen minutes. Would you personally want surgery for fifteen minutes without anesthetic - as is often the case - especially if that surgery was performed on the most sensitive part of your body? Furthermore, remember that the circumcision wound takes 7-10 days to heal. Don't fool yourself - the trauma isn't over the moment the surgery is completed. More than 100 circumcision-related deaths are estimated to occur every year in the United States and more botched cases are reported than hospital administrators would care to admit.